Refusals are documented per finding, not just fixes: every decision ships evidence, approver, change record. The refusals are the part that makes the record credible.
Start watch mode
Criticals stay open 150 days, up 17%.
Automation is fine until the auditor asks who approved the change and the answer is 'the tool'.
Remediation SLAs are the finding on this year's audit.
Instead of screenshots and ticket exports assembled the week before the audit, a receipt per decision: verdict, confidence, evidence trail, what executed, who approved. Your IAM signs; your reviewers stamp.
Three roles, never collapsed into one agent.
Filtered to what you did not do.
Nothing moves without context, and that pause is itself recorded.
Your reviewers stamp the evidence; the engine does the reading. More review, not less.
Bring the control you dread testing; walk one receipt against its checklist.
The record every decision ships: verdict, evidence trail, what executed, who approved, rescan result, rollback point.
Your named approver, recorded per decision; the engine never approves itself.
Yes, per finding, with the evidence. Declined is an answer.
30 minutes, read-only: watch the engine read the evidence on that finding and call it safe, risky, or awaiting data.
Everyone automates the yes. We mastered the no.
