Cortex Cloud scores the case. Tamnoon refuses, closes, and signs.

Self-healing infrastructure restores desired state: a pod restarts, an instance is replaced, a group scales back up. It is availability automation and it exercises no judgment about safety. Tamnoon heals the security posture instead: it investigates the finding in context, decides whether a change is safe to make at all, refuses what it cannot prove, and leaves the receipt behind. Restarting a pod is not the same as knowing which bucket must stay public.

Cortex Cloud automates hygiene on its own findings. Tamnoon works on what remains after that. It investigates each issue read-only in your live environment, groups things together to increase efficiency of each action instead of going a single issue at a time, closes what it can prove safe through your own change process, declines what it cannot with the evidence why, and answers for the outcome.

Both. Tamnoon reads Prisma Cloud alerts and Cortex Cloud issues today, so the queue keeps draining while the platforms change underneath it, and every judgment made on one side carries to the other. A platform transition should not mean re-answering questions the queue already answered.

No. Tamnoon sits downstream of the Cortex Cloud you already run, reading issues through the API with read access. Your automation rules, playbooks and case grouping stay exactly as they are. No scanner to replace, no contract to end.

A tool that fires fixes blind is an autoimmune reaction: it attacks the body it is supposed to protect. Tamnoon starts from the opposite premise. Every fix is investigated read-only first, against live traffic, usage, dependencies and ownership. What it cannot prove safe it refuses, and the refusal ships with the evidence why. You were not wrong to pull the plug on a tool that could not tell you why a change was safe.